Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360772›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2025

Incidence of probiotic sepsis and morbidity risk in premature infants: a meta-analysis.

Keith Feldman, Janelle R Noel-MacDonnell, Lucy B Pappas, Jermine Harriet Romald, Shelby L Olson, Alexandra Oschman, Alain C Cuna, Venkatesh Sampath

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Necrotizing enterocolitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Necrotizing Enterocolitis: What's New and What's Next?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Keith FeldmanDivision of Health Services and Outcomes Research, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Janelle R Noel-MacDonnellDivision of Health Services and Outcomes Research, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Lucy B PappasDepartment of Nutrition, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Jermine Harriet RomaldDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Shelby L OlsonDepartment of Nutrition, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Alexandra OschmanDepartment of Pharmacy, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Alain C CunaUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Venkatesh SampathUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA. vsampath@cmh.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor preterm infants, supplementation with probiotics improves rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and other morbidities. Case reports of probiotic sepsis have prompted warnings from the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Federal Drug Administration. However, incidence rates of probiotic sepsis are lacking, making it challenging to evaluate risk-benefit tradeoffs. We performed a meta-analysis and review of probiotic sepsis events in preterm infants to evaluate tradeoffs against NEC, mortality, and clinical sepsis outcomes.

methodsDual-reviewers screened 160 articles, selecting 77 for review. Pooled estimates of incidence were computed using random-effect models. Case reports captured infant demographics, hospital course, and outcome.

resultsFor 20,323 exposed infants across 63 studies, 8 probiotic sepsis cases were identified [estimate: 0% (95% CI: 0-10%)]. Risk-benefit calculations note an additional 62 cases of NEC, 42 deaths, and 92 clinical sepsis events in the unexposed cohort per case of probiotic sepsis. Case reports identified 27 probiotic sepsis events, mostly in extremely-low-birthweight infants (median GA/BW: 28 weeks, 970.0 g) and those at risk for bacterial translocation.

conclusionProbiotic sepsis is extremely rare in preterm infants, with the greatest risk in an identifiable sub-population. Estimates highlighted increased morbidities in unexposed cohorts compared to probiotic sepsis incidence, suggesting consideration of risk-benefit may be warranted. IMPACT: This study quantifies the risk of probiotic sepsis in preterm infants utilizing a meta-analysis. In over 20,000 exposed infants across 40 randomized trials and 23 observational studies, 8 cases of probiotic sepsis were identified (<0.04%). Assessing this risk against improvements in morbidities with probiotic use, we can expect 62 more cases of NEC, 42 more deaths, and 92 more cases of clinical sepsis per case of probiotic sepsis (1:2500) avoided in the unexposed group. While the use of probiotics carries risk, rates for probiotic sepsis presented by this analysis highlight a favorable benefit/risk ratio in preterm infants.

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.