ArticlePediatric research2025
Incidence of probiotic sepsis and morbidity risk in premature infants: a meta-analysis.
Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Strain-Specific Effects of Early-Life Probiotic Supplementation on Respiratory Infections in Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- Probiotics and Risk of Death, Necrotizing Enterocolitis, and Sepsis in Very Preterm Infants.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Necrotizing enterocolitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- A Review of Probiotic Interventions for Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Sepsis in Preterm Infants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Microbiome Signatures in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Emerging Biomarkers for Risk Stratification, Therapy Guidance, and Prognostic Insight.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mechanisms by which tryptophan metabolites enhance intestinal barrier function to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Antibiotic-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis in the PICU: mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and management strategies - a narrative review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Current state of microbiota clinical applications in neonatal and pediatric bacterial infections.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- The microbiome's hidden influence: preclinical insights into inflammatory responses in necrotizing enterocolitis.Seminars in immunopathology · 2025Review
- Necrotizing Enterocolitis: What's New and What's Next?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Bilirubin-microbiota interaction: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies in neonatal jaundice.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor preterm infants, supplementation with probiotics improves rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and other morbidities. Case reports of probiotic sepsis have prompted warnings from the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Federal Drug Administration. However, incidence rates of probiotic sepsis are lacking, making it challenging to evaluate risk-benefit tradeoffs. We performed a meta-analysis and review of probiotic sepsis events in preterm infants to evaluate tradeoffs against NEC, mortality, and clinical sepsis outcomes.
methodsDual-reviewers screened 160 articles, selecting 77 for review. Pooled estimates of incidence were computed using random-effect models. Case reports captured infant demographics, hospital course, and outcome.
resultsFor 20,323 exposed infants across 63 studies, 8 probiotic sepsis cases were identified [estimate: 0% (95% CI: 0-10%)]. Risk-benefit calculations note an additional 62 cases of NEC, 42 deaths, and 92 clinical sepsis events in the unexposed cohort per case of probiotic sepsis. Case reports identified 27 probiotic sepsis events, mostly in extremely-low-birthweight infants (median GA/BW: 28 weeks, 970.0 g) and those at risk for bacterial translocation.
conclusionProbiotic sepsis is extremely rare in preterm infants, with the greatest risk in an identifiable sub-population. Estimates highlighted increased morbidities in unexposed cohorts compared to probiotic sepsis incidence, suggesting consideration of risk-benefit may be warranted. IMPACT: This study quantifies the risk of probiotic sepsis in preterm infants utilizing a meta-analysis. In over 20,000 exposed infants across 40 randomized trials and 23 observational studies, 8 cases of probiotic sepsis were identified (<0.04%). Assessing this risk against improvements in morbidities with probiotic use, we can expect 62 more cases of NEC, 42 more deaths, and 92 more cases of clinical sepsis per case of probiotic sepsis (1:2500) avoided in the unexposed group. While the use of probiotics carries risk, rates for probiotic sepsis presented by this analysis highlight a favorable benefit/risk ratio in preterm infants.
Identifiers
40360772What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.