Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360861›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Stress in action wearables database: A database of noninvasive wearable monitors with systematic technical, reliability, validity, and usability information.

Myrte Schoenmakers, Melisa Saygin, Magdalena Sikora, Thomas Vaessen, Matthijs Noordzij, Eco de Geus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessing Stress Level Scores Against Wearables-Driven Physiological Measurements.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Myrte Schoenmakers *Department of Biological Psychology, VU Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3458-162X
Melisa Saygin *Department of Biological Psychology, VU Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Magdalena Sikora *Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Thomas VaessenDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Matthijs NoordzijDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Eco de GeusDepartment of Biological Psychology, VU Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, Netherlands. eco.de.geus@vu.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ambulatory wearable monitoring of human physiology is increasingly utilized in the fields of psychology, movement sciences, and medicine. With the rapid growth of available consumer- and research-oriented wearables, researchers are faced with a multitude of devices to choose from. It is unfeasible timewise for researchers to determine all relevant technical specifications, available signals, signal sampling details, and (raw) data availability, and conduct a search of studies regarding the reliability, validity, and usability of wearables. Thus, selection of wearables for a given study proves highly challenging and will often be unsystematic and uninformed. The 10-year research program Stress in Action initiated a publicly accessible database of wearable ambulatory monitoring devices. We outline the genesis and final structure of the first version of the Stress in Action Wearables Database (SiA-WD) and a summary of the characteristics of the wearables it currently contains. Furthermore, one short-term (2 days) and one long-term (3 months) scenario from the field of stress research are provided with walkthroughs of how the SiA-WD can help select the optimal wearable for a specific research project. Insights gathered include the scarceness of studies testing wearable user-friendliness, inconsistencies in reported validity statistics, and imprecise manufacturer documentation on recorded physiological data such as sampling rate (or window) of signals and parameter extraction. The SiA-WD is the first open-access database to simultaneously include physiological sampling information and technical specifications along with a systematic reliability, validity, and usability search. It will be iteratively expanded to facilitate informed and time-efficient wearable selection. For access to the database, see the following: https://osf.io/umgvp/ .

Indexed as

Databases, FactualMonitoring, AmbulatoryStress, PsychologicalWearable Electronic DevicesHumansReproducibility of ResultsAmbulatoryDatabasePhysiologyReliabilityUsabilityValidationWearable

Identifiers

PMID40360861
PMCPMC12075381

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.