ArticleNature aging2025
Reference centiles for intrinsic capacity to monitor clinical health outcomes in real-world primary care cohorts.
Article in Nature aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intrinsic capacity and mortality in community-dwelling octogenarians: a network analysis from the ilSIRENTE study.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Association between intrinsic capacity and disability before death among older adults: a decedent cohort study.The lancet. Healthy longevity · 2026Article
- Could animal models be used to longitudinally track intrinsic capacity during aging?The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2026Article
- Implementing a nationwide healthy longevity program for older adults.Nature aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrinsic capacity (IC) refers to physical and mental capacities that determine healthy aging. IC is the central element of the World Health Organization care pathway 'Integrated Care for Older People' (ICOPE). However, the operationalization of a composite IC measurement in clinical settings remains to be defined. We used screening data from ICOPE implementation in a real-life population of 27,706 adults 60 years or older that were users of primary care services to elaborate and cross-validate IC scores and centile values for men and women. Here, we show that IC centiles were cross-sectionally associated with comorbidity, frailty and limitations in both activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. External validation using populations from high-income (French INSPIRE-T cohort) and upper-middle-income (ICOPE Brazil) countries validated the associations between IC centiles and clinical outcomes. The IC centiles developed using ICOPE screening data constitute a standardized parameter to monitor individual and population IC through a clinically friendly approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40360907What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.