ReviewStem cell research & therapy2025
Challenges and opportunities in the compassionate use of out-of-specification products in autologous regenerative medicine.
Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clonal Hematopoiesis does not influence manufacturing of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cells.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Nanofiber-reinforced ECM-based bioink for hybrid biofabrication of adventitia-mimetic anisotropic vascular constructs.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Current status and issues with CAR-T cell products in Japan: a regulatory perspective.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, therapeutic preparations using patient-derived tissues have emerged as commercially approved regenerative medicine products for expanding treatment possibilities for patients with no other treatment options. Autologous cell-processed products, derived from the tissue of the patient, typically exhibit variability in raw material quality, resulting in the generation of out-of-specification (OOS) products. MAIN BODY: The compassionate use of OOS products is also practiced by the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency; differences among the three regulatory authorities were investigated to identify challenges in Japan. For conditions with no alternative treatments and severe time constraints, OOS products are sometimes used under compassionate grounds, particularly in Japan, where they are administered within the framework of clinical trials. This approach, although ethical, imposes significant operational and administrative burdens on medical institutions and marketing authorisation holders, raising concerns about sustainability. We considered the rationalisation of the current system and reached the conclusion that it would not contribute to load reduction and sustainability; thus, we devised a new framework.
conclusionThis study reviewed the compassionate use systems for OOS products in Japan, the United States, and Europe, highlighting current challenges and proposing a sustainable regulatory framework for future practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.