ArticleCancers2025
Safely Targeting Cancer, the Wound That Never Heals, Utilizing CBP/Beta-Catenin Antagonists.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Advances in Mechanism of Action and Efficacy of CBP/p300 Inhibitors in Different Subtypes of Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Targeting the WNT/β-Catenin Pathway in Hematological Malignancies: From Molecular Pathogenesis to Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Theragenerative Nanomaterials: Integrating Therapy, Regeneration, and Diagnosis-Navigating the Shared Pathways Between Tissue Repair and Malignancy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stem cells, both normal somatic (SSC) and cancer stem cells (CSC) exist in minimally two states, i.e., quiescent and activated. Regulation of these two states, including their reliance on different metabolic processes, i.e., FAO and glycolysis in quiescent versus activated stem cells respectively, involves the analysis of a complex array of factors (nutrient and oxygen levels, adhesion molecules, cytokines, etc.) to initiate the epigenetic changes to either depart or enter quiescence. Quiescence is a critical feature of SSC that is required to maintain the genomic integrity of the stem cell pool, particularly in long lived complex organisms. Quiescence in CSC, whether they are derived from mutations arising in SSC, aberrant microenvironmental regulation, or via dedifferentiation of more committed progenitors, is a critical component of therapy resistance and disease latency and relapse. At the beginning of vertebrate evolution, approximately 450 million years ago, a gene duplication generated the two members of the Kat3 family, CREBBP (CBP) and EP300 (p300). Despite their very high degree of homology, these two Kat3 coactivators play critical and non-redundant roles at enhancers and super-enhancers via acetylation of H3K27, thereby controlling stem cell quiescence versus activation and the cells metabolic requirements. In this review/perspective, we discuss the unique regulatory roles of CBP and p300 and how specifically targeting the CBP/β-catenin interaction utilizing small molecule antagonists, can correct lineage infidelity and safely eliminate quiescent CSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.