Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40361507›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

The Evolving Landscape of Radiomics in Gliomas: Insights into Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Research Trends.

Mehek Dedhia, Isabelle M Germano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehek DedhiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6579-9528
Isabelle M GermanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomas are the most prevalent and aggressive form of primary brain tumors. The clinical challenge in managing patients with this disease revolves around the difficulty of diagnosis, both at onset and during treatment, and the scarcity of prognostic outcome indicators. Radiomics involves the extraction of quantitative features from medical images with the help of artificial intelligence, positioning it as a promising tool to be integrated into the care of glioma patients. Using data from 52 studies and 12,482 patients over two years, this review explores how radiomics can enhance the initial diagnosis of gliomas, especially helping to differentiate treatment stages that may be difficult for the human eye to do otherwise. Radiomics has also been able to identify patient-specific tumor molecular signatures for targeted treatments without the need for invasive surgical biopsy. Such an approach could lead to earlier interventions and more precise individualized therapies that are tailored to each patient. Additionally, it could be integrated into clinical practice to improve longitudinal diagnosis during treatment and predict tumor recurrence. Finally, radiomics has the potential to predict clinical outcomes, helping both patients and providers set realistic expectations. While this field is continuously evolving, future research should conduct such studies in larger, multi-institutional cohorts to enhance generalizability and applicability in clinical practice and focus on combining radiomics with other modalities to improve its predictive accuracy and clinical utility.

Indexed as

brain tumorsgliomasmachine learningneuro-oncologyradiomics

Identifiers

PMID40361507
PMCPMC12071695

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.