Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40361609›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Will Australians Eat Alternative Proteins?

Diana Bogueva, Dora Marinova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Diana BoguevaCurtin University Sustainability Policy (CUSP) Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7226-1395
Dora MarinovaCurtin University Sustainability Policy (CUSP) Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5125-8878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Australia, which has one of the world's highest per capita meat consumption rates, is hesitant toward adopting alternative proteins. This study examines consumer perceptions of protein alternatives and their perceived safety, nutritional value, health risks, cost and willingness to incorporate them into their diets. Using a mixed-methods approach, a survey of 520 Australians aged 18 to 64 revealed that while alternative proteins are viewed as occasional dietary options, younger consumers-despite their tendency to favour traditional food choices-show interest in plant-based milk and algae-based products. However, across all generations, interest in regular consumption of plant-based meats, insects and cultured meat remains low. These findings highlight evolving attitudes, challenges to market growth, and the importance of fostering greater consumer trust to encourage wider adoption of alternative proteins. Addressing generational differences in adoption and resistance will be essential for expanding market penetration.

Indexed as

algae-derived foodsalternative proteinsAustraliaconsumer perceptioncultured meatfood choicesfood consumptionfood safetyGeneration Zhealth risksinsect-based proteinsnutritional valueplant-based foodssustainability

Identifiers

PMID40361609
PMCPMC12071469

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.