ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Systematic Literature Review for Blockchain-Based Healthcare Implementations.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blockchain for Digital Health Governance: Evidence Gap Map and Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Towards convergence of AI and blockchain for personalized medicine in pharmacogenomics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Secure, scalable, and interoperable healthcare data exchange using layer-2 ZK-rollups, smart contracts, and IPFS.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Blockchain-Based Architecture for Dynamic and Auditable Patient Consent in Secondary Use of Health Data.Blockchain in healthcare today · 2026Article
- Blockchain Applications in Core Healthcare Services: Patient Data, Research, and Institutional Processes.Blockchain in healthcare today · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare information systems are hindered by delayed data sharing, privacy breaches, and lack of patient control over data. The growing need for secure, privacy-preserved access control interoperable in health informatics technology (HIT) systems appeals to solutions such as Blockchain (BC), which offers a decentralized, transparent, and immutable ledger architecture. However, its current adoption remains limited to conceptual or proofs-of-concept (PoCs), often relying on simulated datasets rather than validated real-world data or scenarios, necessitating further research into its pragmatic applications and their benchmarking.
objectiveThis systematic literature review (SLR) aims to analyze BC-based healthcare implementations by benchmarking peer-reviewed studies and turning PoCs or production insights into real-world applications and their evaluation metrics. Unlike prior SLRs focusing on proposed or conceptual models, simulations, or limited-scale deployments, this review focuses on validating practical BC real-world applications in healthcare settings beyond conceptual studies and PoCs.
methodsAdhering to PRISMA-2020 guidelines, we systematically searched five major databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and ScienceDirect) for high-precision relevant studies using MeSH terms related to BC in healthcare. The designed review protocol was registered with OSF, ensuring transparency in the review process, including study screening by independent reviewers, eligibility, quality assessment, and data extraction and synthesis.
resultsIn total, 82 original studies fully met the eligibility criteria and narratively reported BC-based healthcare implementations with validated evaluation outcomes. These studies highlight the current challenges addressed by BC in healthcare settings, providing both qualitative and quantitative data synthesis on its effectiveness.
conclusionsBC-based healthcare implementations show both qualitative and quantitative effectiveness, with advancements in areas such as drug traceability (up to 100%) and fraud prevention (95% reduction). We also discussed the recent challenges of focusing more attention in this area, along with a discussion on the mythological consideration of our own work. Our future research should focus on addressing scalability, privacy-preservation, security, integration, and ethical frameworks for widespread BC adoption for data-driven healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.