Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40361993›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Advancing Cervical Cancer Prevention Equity: Innovations in Self-Sampling and Digital Health Technologies Across Healthcare Settings.

Michelle Gomes, Elena Provaggi, Andrea Barnabas Pembe, Adeola Olaitan, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [An auxiliary diagnosis system for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia based on colposcopic images].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Real-World Performance of HPV DNA-Based Screening in Health Resource-Limited Areas of China: A Multicenter Implementation Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle GomesDepartment of Global Health and Development, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Elena ProvaggiAnne's Day Ltd. (Daye), London SE16 4DG, UK.
Andrea Barnabas PembeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), Dar es Salaam 11103, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-8090-3298
Adeola OlaitanDepartment of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK.ORCID 0009-0009-3887-8621
Aleksandra Gentry-MaharajDepartment of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7270-9762

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer causes 350,000 deaths annually, with 90% occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), despite being largely preventable through vaccination and screening. This review examines innovative approaches to address screening coverage gaps worldwide, analysing both established programmes in high-income countries and implementation strategies for LMICs. Self-sampling technologies demonstrate significant potential to improve the uptake of cervical screening, thereby improving cervical cancer prevention compared to traditional methods, particularly benefiting underserved populations across all healthcare settings. Among self-collection devices, vaginal brushes achieve sensitivity of 94.6% (95% CI: 92.4-96.8) for HPV detection, while novel approaches like the tampon show promising results (sensitivity 82.9-100%, specificity 91.6-96.8%) with high user acceptability. Implementation strategies vary by healthcare context, with high-income countries achieving success through integrated screening programmes and digital solutions, while LMICs demonstrate effective adaptation through community-based distribution (20-35% uptake) and innovative delivery methods. In resource-limited settings, self-sampling increases participation through enhanced patient comfort and cultural acceptability, while reducing costs by 32-48%. Progress toward WHO's cervical cancer elimination goals require careful consideration of local healthcare infrastructure, cultural contexts and sustainable financing mechanisms. Future research priorities include optimising self-sampling technologies for sustainability and scalability, developing context-specific implementation strategies and validating artificial intelligence applications to enhance screening efficiency across diverse healthcare settings.

Indexed as

cervical cancer (CC)FemTechhuman papillomavirus (HPV)low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)screeningself-sampling

Identifiers

PMID40361993
PMCPMC12071443

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.