ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Innovative Approaches in Bone Tissue Engineering: Strategies for Cancer Treatment and Recovery.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone Tissue Engineering: Scaffold Design Principles, Biomaterial Advances, and Strategies for Functional Regeneration and Clinical Translation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exosome-loaded hydrogels for bone regeneration: a cell-free therapeutic strategy.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Article
- Treatment of Maxillofacial Cancers by Zein Nanoparticles Loaded with Anticancer Peptide Pistacia Zardin1: Enhanced Cytotoxicity and Apoptosis Induction in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC).Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhanced bone regeneration and cellular protection from oxidative stress using a vitamin C-based scaffold.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Article
- Biomimetic Additive Manufacturing: Engineering Complexity Inspired by Nature's Simplicity.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer has rapidly emerged as a leading global cause of premature mortality, with significant economic implications projected to reach USD 25.2 trillion from 2020 to 2050. Among the various types of cancer, primary bone cancers, though uncommon, are projected to see nearly 4000 new cases diagnosed in the United States in 2024. The complexity of treating bone cancer arises from its rarity, diversity, and the challenges associated with surgical interventions, metastatic spread, and post-operative complications. Advancements in bone tissue engineering (BTE) have introduced innovative therapeutic approaches to promote bone regeneration and address tumor recurrence. This interdisciplinary field integrates biomaterials, scaffolds, and gene therapy, utilizing technologies such as 3D bioprinting to create custom scaffolds that facilitate cellular activities essential for tissue regeneration. Recent developments in biodegradable, bioactive materials aim to enhance the biocompatibility and effectiveness of scaffolds, while nanotechnology presents promising avenues for targeted drug delivery and improved therapeutic outcomes. This review outlines the current landscape of BTE, highlighting scaffold fabrication techniques, the advantages of incorporating stem cell and gene therapies, and future directions, including the integration of artificial intelligence in scaffold design for personalized medicine in orthopedic oncology. This work underscores the necessity for ongoing research and innovation, aiming to improve therapeutic strategies specifically designed to address the unique challenges posed by bone sarcomas and metastatic cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.