ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Evolution in Bone Tissue Regeneration: From Grafts to Innovative Biomaterials.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimally Invasive Implant Rehabilitation in Geriatric Patients: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Contemporary Strategies to Avoid Extensive Bone Augmentation Procedures.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Histological and histomorphometric assessment of lateral window sinus augmentation in severe maxillary atrophy using a mixed allograft with β-TCP/HA and autologous platelet-rich fibrin.BMC oral health · 2026Observational
- Heterologous Fibrin Biopolymer as a Key Scaffold for Bone Regeneration: Synergistic Effects with Photobiomodulation and Membrane Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bioceramics Based on Li-Modified Bioactive Glasses for Bone Tissue Regeneration.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Immune-Guided Bone Healing: The Role of Osteoimmunity in Tissue Engineering Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Biomimetic Three-Dimensional (3D) Scaffolds from Sustainable Biomaterials: Innovative Green Medicine Approach to Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone defects caused by various traumas and diseases such as osteoporosis, which affects bone density, and osteosarcoma, which affects the integrity of bone structure, are now well known. Given this situation, several innovative research projects have been reported to improve orthopedic methods and technologies that positively contribute to the regeneration of affected bone tissue, representing a significant advance in regenerative medicine. This review article comprehensively analyzes the transition from existing methods and technologies for implants and bone tissue regeneration to innovative biomaterials. These biomaterials have been of great interest in the last decade due to their physicochemical characteristics, which allow them to overcome the most common limitations of traditional grafting methods, such as the availability of biomaterials and the risk of rejection after their application in regenerative medicine. This could be achieved through an exhaustive study of the applications and properties of various materials with potential applications in regenerative medicine, such as using magnetic nanoparticles and hydrogels sensitive to external stimuli, including pH and temperature. In this regard, this review article describes the most relevant compounds used in bone tissue regeneration, promoting the integration of these biomaterials with the affected area's bone structure, thereby allowing for regeneration and preventing amputation. Additionally, the types of interactions between biomaterials and mesenchymal stem cells and their effects on bone tissue are discussed, which is critical for developing biomaterials with optimal regenerative properties. Furthermore, the mechanisms of action of the various biomaterials that enhance osteoconduction and osteoinduction, ensuring the success of orthopedic therapies, are analyzed. This enables the treatment of bone defects tailored to each patient's condition, thereby avoiding limb amputation. Consequently, a promising future for regenerative medicine is emerging, with various therapies that could revolutionize the management of bone defects, offering more efficient and safer solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.