ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
GLIO-Select: Machine Learning-Based Feature Selection and Weighting of Tissue and Serum Proteomic and Metabolomic Data Uncovers Sex Differences in Glioblastoma.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on the role and mechanism of FAT4 in the development and progression of tumor and non-tumor diseases.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Driven Metabolomic Biomarker Discovery in Glioblastoma: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The expression pattern and prognostic relevance of p120-catenin, COL4A2 and SOX10 in glioma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Drug Repurposing in Glioblastoma Using a Machine Learning-Based Hybrid Feature Selection Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Multi-Omics Approaches in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a fatal brain cancer known for its rapid and aggressive growth, with some studies indicating that females may have better survival outcomes compared to males. While sex differences in GBM have been observed, the underlying biological mechanisms remain poorly understood. Feature selection can lead to the identification of discriminative key biomarkers by reducing dimensionality from high-dimensional medical datasets to improve machine learning model performance, explainability, and interpretability. Feature selection can uncover unique sex-specific biomarkers, determinants, and molecular profiles in patients with GBM. We analyzed high-dimensional proteomic and metabolomic profiles from serum biospecimens obtained from 109 patients with pathology-proven glioblastoma (GBM) on NIH IRB-approved protocols with full clinical annotation (local dataset). Serum proteomic analysis was performed using Somalogic aptamer-based technology (measuring 7289 proteins) and serum metabolome analysis using the University of Florida's SECIM (Southeast Center for Integrated Metabolomics) platform (measuring 6015 metabolites). Machine learning-based feature selection was employed to identify proteins and metabolites associated with male and female labels in high-dimensional datasets. Results were compared to publicly available proteomic and metabolomic datasets (CPTAC and TCGA) using the same methodology and TCGA data previously structured for glioma grading. Employing a machine learning-based and hybrid feature selection approach, utilizing both LASSO and mRMR, in conjunction with a rank-based weighting method (i.e., GLIO-Select), we linked proteomic and metabolomic data to clinical data for the purposes of feature reduction to identify molecular biomarkers associated with biological sex in patients with GBM and used a separate TCGA set to explore possible linkages between biological sex and mutations associated with tumor grading. Serum proteomic and metabolomic data identified several hundred features that were associated with the male/female class label in the GBM datasets. Using the local serum-based dataset of 109 patients, 17 features (100% ACC) and 16 features (92% ACC) were identified for the proteomic and metabolomic datasets, respectively. Using the CPTAC tissue-based dataset (8828 proteomic and 59 metabolomic features), 5 features (99% ACC) and 13 features (80% ACC) were identified for the proteomic and metabolomic datasets, respectively. The proteomic data serum or tissue (CPTAC) achieved the highest accuracy rates (100% and 99%, respectively), followed by serum metabolome and tissue metabolome. The local serum data yielded several clinically known features (PSA, PZP, HCG, and FSH) which were distinct from CPTAC tissue data (RPS4Y1 and DDX3Y), both providing methodological validation, with PZP and defensins (DEFA3 and DEFB4A) representing shared proteomic features between serum and tissue. Metabolomic features shared between serum and tissue were homocysteine and pantothenic acid. Several signals emerged that are known to be associated with glioma or GBM but not previously known to be associated with biological sex, requiring further research, as well as several novel signals that were previously not linked to either biological sex or glioma. EGFR, FAT4, and BCOR were the three features associated with 64% ACC using the TCGA glioma grading set. GLIO-Select shows remarkable results in reducing feature dimensionality when different types of datasets (e.g., serum and tissue-based) were used for our analyses. The proposed approach successfully reduced relevant features to less than twenty biomarkers for each GBM dataset. Serum biospecimens appear to be highly effective for identifying biologically relevant sex differences in GBM. These findings suggest that serum-based noninvasive biospecimen-based analyses may provide more accurate and clinically detailed insights into sex as a biological variable (SABV) as compared to other biospecimens, with several signals linking sex differences and glioma pathology via immune response, amino acid metabolism, and cancer hallmark signals requiring further research. Our results underscore the importance of biospecimen choice and feature selection in enhancing the interpretation of omics data for understanding sex-based differences in GBM. This discovery holds significant potential for enhancing personalized treatment plans and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.