ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
From Sensors to Care: How Robotic Skin Is Transforming Modern Healthcare-A Mini Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bio-Inspired Internal Representations of Tactile Sensation, Pain, and Damage for Artificial Skin Using Spatio-Temporal Anomaly Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Why care resists coding: the moral limits of medical AI.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Will AI Replace Physicians in the Near Future? AI Adoption Barriers in Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Social robot design preferences as reported by stakeholders.Frontiers in dementia · 2026Article
- Developing a Psychological Research Methodology for Evaluating AI-Powered Plush Robots in Education and Rehabilitation.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Bionic Sensors for Biometric Acquisition and Monitoring: Challenges and Opportunities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, robotics has made notable progress, becoming an essential component of daily life by facilitating complex tasks and enhancing human experiences. While most robots have traditionally featured hard surfaces, the growing demand for more comfortable and safer human-robot interactions has driven the development of soft robots. One type of soft robot, which incorporates innovative skin materials, transforms rigid structures into more pliable and adaptive forms, making them better suited for interacting with humans. Especially in healthcare and rehabilitation, robotic skin technology has gained substantial attention, offering transformative solutions for improving the functionality of prosthetics, exoskeletons, and companion robots. Although replicating the complex sensory functions of human skin remains a challenge, ongoing research in soft robotics focuses on developing sensors that mimic the softness and tactile sensitivity necessary for effective interaction. This review provides a narrative analysis of current trends in robotic skin development, specifically tailored for healthcare and rehabilitation applications, including skin types of sensor technologies, materials, challenges, and future research directions in this rapidly developing field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.