Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40363389›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Research Progress on Data-Driven Industrial Fault Diagnosis Methods.

Liang Lei, Weibin Li, Shiwei Zhang, Changyuan Wu, Hongxiang Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liang LeiSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China.
Weibin LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0047-8955
Shiwei ZhangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Northwestern University, Xi'an 710127, China.
Changyuan WuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China.
Hongxiang YuHangzhou Institute of Technology, Xidian University, Hangzhou 311231, China.

Funding

2022 Xi'an Science and Technology Plan Project 23ZDCYTSGG0026-2022Concept Validation Fund Project of Xidian University and Hangzhou Institute of Technology in 2023 GNYZ2023GY0402Key projects of Shaanxi Provincial Department City linkage 2022GD-TSLD-61Key R&D Program Project of Shaanxi Province 2021GY-102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of Industry 5.0, fault diagnosis is playing an increasingly important role in routine equipment maintenance and condition monitoring. From the perspective of industrial big data, this paper systematically reviews the current mainstream industrial fault diagnosis methods. The content covers the main sources of industrial big data, commonly used datasets, and the construction of related platforms. In conjunction with the development of multi-source heterogeneous data, the paper explores the evolutionary path of fault diagnosis methods. Subsequently, it provides an in-depth analysis of data-driven fault diagnosis techniques in industrial applications, with particular emphasis on the pivotal role of deep learning algorithms in fault diagnosis. Next, it discusses the applications and development of large models in the field of fault diagnosis, focusing on their potential to enhance diagnostic intelligence and generalization under big data environments. Finally, the paper looks ahead to the future development of data-driven fault diagnosis methods, pointing out that data quality, interpretability of deep learning, and edge-based large models are important research directions that urgently require breakthroughs.

Indexed as

deep learningfault diagnosisindustrial big datalarge language models

Identifiers

PMID40363389
PMCPMC12074220

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.