Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40363917›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Phytotherapy in Urolithiasis: An Updated Overview of Current Knowledge.

Wilbert F Mutomba, Evangelos N Symeonidis, Ioannis Mykoniatis, Lazaros Tzelves, Arman Tsaturyan, Patrick Juliebo-Jones, Theodoros Tokas, Petros Sountoulides

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wilbert F MutombaFirst Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6877-3574
Evangelos N SymeonidisSecond Department of Urology, Interbalkan Medical Center, 555 35 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6360-0762
Ioannis MykoniatisFirst Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Lazaros TzelvesEuropean Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU), Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group, NL-6803 AA Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4619-9783
Arman TsaturyanEuropean Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU), Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group, NL-6803 AA Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2499-7015
Patrick Juliebo-JonesEuropean Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU), Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group, NL-6803 AA Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Theodoros TokasDepartment of Urology, Medical School, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, 700 13 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0928-0507
Petros SountoulidesFirst Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2671-571X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urolithiasis is one of the most burdensome urinary tract conditions with a prevalence ranging from 1% to 20%. Approximately half of the patients experience a recurrence, while 10% face multiple stone episodes. Long before the advent of surgical treatment options, herbal therapy, or phytotherapy, had been used for both the prevention and management of urolithiasis. Recently, interest in phytotherapy has been rekindled due to the limitations associated with modern urolithiasis treatment, the limited options for conventional medical therapy, and the added cost of interventions for stones. While research on phytotherapy is still limited, it is ongoing and is yielding promising results. In order to capture the current trend in phytotherapy for urolithiasis, we performed a narrative review from data collected and synthesized from electronic databases, with a specific focus on randomized human studies. Our analysis revealed that the use of various herbal medicines and phytotherapy, either as mixtures or as sole plant extracts, in urolithiasis is on the rise and is mainly utilized as complementary therapy to conventional treatment. Although most studies demonstrate the effectiveness of phytotherapy in reducing stone size and facilitating stone expulsion, several questions regarding specific dosages, mechanisms of action, drug interactions, treatment duration, and types of stones that respond to phytotherapy remain unanswered. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge surrounding the role of phytotherapy in urolithiasis and to determine its role as a primary or complementary treatment alongside traditional treatment options. Ultimately, further research is essential to clarify the abovementioned unresolved issues, overcome the existing challenges, and optimize the best possible phytotherapy strategies and timing for dissolving specific types of stones with these regimens.

Indexed as

herbal medicineskidney stonesphytotherapyurinary calculiurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID40363917
PMCPMC12072574

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.