Evidence mapPaperPMID 40363949Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Challenges and Opportunities of Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) Therapy in Complex Clinical Scenarios: A Comprehensive Review and Practical Guide.

Giuseppe Miceli, Anna Maria Ciaccio, Antonino Tuttolomondo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Different Anticoagulants in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Direct oral anticoagulant interference and removal in the factor VIII inhibitor assay.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giuseppe MiceliDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE) Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-2523
Anna Maria CiaccioDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE) Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Antonino TuttolomondoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE) Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6440-7318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as a preferred alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders, offering improved safety, predictable pharmacokinetics, and ease of administration. Despite these advantages, their use in complex clinical scenarios presents significant challenges that necessitate individualized therapeutic strategies. This comprehensive review explores the efficacy, safety, and limitations of DOAC therapy in special populations, including patients with renal or hepatic impairment, obesity, cancer-associated thrombosis, and antiphospholipid syndrome. Additionally, we examine their role in uncommon thrombotic conditions such as superficial venous thrombosis, embolic stroke of undetermined source, upper extremity vein thrombosis, inferior vena cava thrombosis, pelvic vein thrombosis, and cerebral vein thrombosis. The pharmacokinetic variability of DOACs in renal and hepatic dysfunction requires caution to balance the bleeding and thrombotic risks. In obesity, altered drug distribution and metabolism raise concerns regarding appropriate dosing and therapeutic efficacy. Cancer-associated thrombosis presents a complex interplay of prothrombotic mechanisms, necessitating careful selection of anticoagulant therapy. Furthermore, the use of DOACs in antiphospholipid syndrome remains controversial due to concerns about recurrent thrombotic events. Finally, in some unusual scenarios like inferior vena cava, pelvic vein, and cerebral vein thrombosis, the use of DOACs has scarce evidence. This review aims to guide clinicians in optimizing anticoagulation management in challenging patient populations by synthesizing current evidence and providing practical recommendations.

Indexed as

anticoagulationdirect oral anticoagulantsthrombosis

Identifiers

PMID40363949
PMCPMC12072619

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.