ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Understanding LOT-CRT: Current Insights, Limitations, and Our Center's Experience.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07684547 (REstoration of SYNChronous Cardiac Function Due to Physiologic cArdiac Pacing Modalities With Clinical Endpoints RESYNC-PACE), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
REstoration of SYNChronous Cardiac Function Due to Physiologic cArdiac Pacing Modalities With Clinical Endpoints RESYNC-PACE
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalized Test Bolus MSCT Protocol for Optimal Coronary Sinus Venous Visualization in Candidates for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Resynchronization Effect in Left Bundle Branch Pacing Can be Evaluated Non-Invasively With the Implementation of Lead V8.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Older Patients: A New Opportunity?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Conduction System Pacing Improved Cardiac Functions, Myocardial Work and Functional Capacity in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and Right Bundle Branch Block.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: How Does It Compare to Biventricular Pacing in Terms of Electrocardiographic Parameters and Procedural Outcomes?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Pressure-Volume Loop Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in a Left Ventricular Assist Device Patient.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular (BiV) pacing is the standard treatment for heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and electrical dyssynchrony. However, one in three patients remains a non-responder. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) could represent a more physiological alternative, but its effectiveness is limited in cases of atypical left bundle branch block (LBBB) or intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD). Left Bundle Branch Pacing Optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT) integrates LBBAP with coronary sinus (CS) lead pacing to improve electrical synchrony and clinical outcomes. This review evaluates the feasibility, advantages, disadvantages, and clinical outcomes of LOT-CRT. Additionally, we describe our center's experience and propose an evidence-based implantation algorithm. A review of published studies investigating LOT-CRT was conducted, comparing its effectiveness with BiV-CRT and LBBAP alone using QRS narrowing, LVEF improvement, left ventricular remodeling, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class changes and NT-proBNP levels. It was found that LOT-CRT outperforms BiV-CRT or LBBAP alone in selected populations, at the cost of higher clinical skills, longer procedural times, and specific device setups. Randomized trials are underway to further define its role in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.