ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2025
A comparative analysis of preoperative, intraoperative, and tumor characteristics in emergency and elective right-sided colonic surgery.
Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emergency Diagnostic Phenotypes and Differential Survival in Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare preoperative, intraoperative, and tumor characteristics between patients undergoing emergency and elective surgery for right-sided colon cancer. Despite the worsened prognosis of emergency colorectal cancer cases, studies on right colon cancer remain limited. Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 356 patients who underwent surgery for right-sided colon cancer between January 2015 and April 2023. Patients were categorized into emergency (n=93) and elective (n=263) groups. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, and surgical details were analyzed. Binary logistic regression was applied to identify independent predictors of emergency surgery. Results: Age (p=0.435) and gender distribution (p=0.853) were similar between groups. However, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores were higher in the emergency group (p=0.001), while Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) scores showed no significant difference (p=0.169). T4 (p<0.001), N1 (p=0.008), and M1 stages (p<0.001) were significantly more frequent in the emergency group, along with higher tumor perforation rates (34.4% vs. 1.9%, p<0.001). Open surgery was more common in the emergency group (p=0.005). While total lymph node yield was similar (p=0.501), the number of metastatic lymph nodes was higher in the emergency group (p=0.008). Logistic regression identified higher ASA score, advanced T, N, M stages, tumor perforation, and tumor size as predictors of emergency surgery. Conclusion: Patients undergoing emergency surgery for right colon cancer have more advanced disease, higher tumor perforation rates, and poorer prognostic factors. Laparoscopic surgery was less utilized, which indicates technical challenges. Early diagnosis and screening strategies may reduce emergency interventions and improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.