ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
MMsurv: a multimodal multi-instance multi-cancer survival prediction model integrating pathological images, clinical information, and sequencing data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Handling missing modalities in multimodal survival prediction for non-small cell lung cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- MCLAM: a cost-effective deep learning model for predicting recurrence risk in HR+/HER2- breast cancer-a multi-center study in a Chinese cohort.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026Article
- Resilient Sinkhorn-Based Optimal Transport Late Fusion Framework for Breast Cancer Diagnosis.Cancer informatics · 2026Article
- AI-driven pathology in esophageal cancer: from early screening to precision prognostics.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- A multi-task deep learning framework for simultaneous prediction of microsatellite instability and tumor mutational burden in gastric cancer from histopathological images.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based fusion of nuclear segmentation features for microsatellite instability and tumor mutational burden prediction in digestive tract cancers: a multicenter validation study.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Robust Multimodal Fusion for Survival Prediction in Cancer Patients.Cancer informatics · 2025Article
- MCAMamba: A multimodal method with bidirectional cross-attention and state space model for cancer survival prediction.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of patient survival rates in cancer treatment is essential for effective therapeutic planning. Unfortunately, current models often underutilize the extensive multimodal data available, affecting confidence in predictions. This study presents MMSurv, an interpretable multimodal deep learning model to predict survival in different types of cancer. MMSurv integrates clinical information, sequencing data, and hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) to forecast patient survival. Specifically, we segment tumor regions from WSIs into image tiles and employ neural networks to encode each tile into one-dimensional feature vectors. We then optimize clinical features by applying word embedding techniques, inspired by natural language processing, to the clinical data. To better utilize the complementarity of multimodal data, this study proposes a novel fusion method, multimodal fusion method based on compact bilinear pooling and transformer, which integrates bilinear pooling with Transformer architecture. The fused features are then processed through a dual-layer multi-instance learning model to remove prognosis-irrelevant image patches and predict each patient's survival risk. Furthermore, we employ cell segmentation to investigate the cellular composition within the tiles that received high attention from the model, thereby enhancing its interpretive capacity. We evaluate our approach on six cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The results demonstrate that utilizing multimodal data leads to higher predictive accuracy compared to using single-modal image data, with an average C-index increase from 0.6750 to 0.7283. Additionally, we compare our proposed baseline model with state-of-the-art methods using the C-index and five-fold cross-validation approach, revealing a significant average improvement of nearly 10% in our model's performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.