Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40367038›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Wild gelada monkeys detect emotional and prosocial cues in vocal exchanges during aggression.

Luca Pedruzzi, Martina Francesconi, Alice Galotti, Bezawork Afework Bogale, Elisabetta Palagi, Alban Lemasson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luca PedruzziEthoS (Ethologie Animale et Humaine) - U.M.R, Université de Rennes, Université de Normandie, CNRS, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4716-3440
Martina FrancesconiUnit of Ethology, Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Alice GalottiUnit of Ethology, Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Bezawork Afework BogaleDepartment of Zoological Sciences, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Elisabetta PalagiUnit of Ethology, Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2038-4596
Alban LemassonEthoS (Ethologie Animale et Humaine) - U.M.R, Université de Rennes, Université de Normandie, CNRS, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognizing vocal behaviours intended to benefit others is a crucial yet understudied social skill. Primates with rich vocal repertoires and complex societies are excellent models to track the evolution of such capacity. Here, we exposed wild geladas (Theropithecus gelada) to vocal exchanges between unfamiliar female victim screams and male affiliative calls. The stimuli were arranged in sequences either simulating vocal affiliation towards victims (scream-affiliative call) or violating such order (affiliative call-scream), with varying emotional arousal conveyed by the affiliative call type. Measuring gazing activity towards the loudspeaker and the interruptions of feeding, we show that monkeys were sensitive to the sequential order in vocal exchanges as well as to the emotional arousal conveyed by affiliative calls. Our field study suggests a prosocial use of vocalizations in wild monkeys and reveals that foundational cognitive elements for processing vocal exchanges as meaningful third-party interactions may have existed in our common ancestors with monkeys.

Indexed as

AggressionCuesEmotionsSocial BehaviorTheropithecusVocalization, AnimalAnimalsFemaleMale

Identifiers

PMID40367038
PMCPMC12077720

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.