ArticlePloS one2025
Neuromusculoskeletal modeling of spasticity: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Passive movement interventions and spasticity outcomes in individuals with spinal cord injury during rehabilitation: a scoping review.Spinal cord · 2025Article
- Metric properties of the Tonic Stretch Reflex Threshold (TSRT) as a measure of spasticity: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Archives of physiotherapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis scoping review aimed to provide an overview of neuromusculoskeletal models used to investigate the mechanisms underlying spasticity and identify issues to be addressed in future models. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines and searched four bibliographic databases (PubMed, Compendex Engineering Village, IEEE Xplore, and Science Direct). Inclusion criteria were original studies written in English that investigated the underlying mechanisms of spasticity in humans with no age restrictions. Two independent reviewers selected studies.
resultsEighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Stroke was the neurological condition addressed by most studies, followed by cerebral palsy. The studies focused mainly on passive tasks with the knee joint as the primary target. All studies considered that spasticity was associated with alterations in the stretch reflex loop. Among the parameters tested by the studies, the reflex gains and thresholds were the parameters that could better represent levels of severity or effects of botulinum toxin type-A treatment. Recent studies proposed that stretching acceleration, muscle force, and force rate could be fed back into the feedback loop besides the muscle length and stretching velocity. However, no consensus was found among them. Finally, it has been that stiffness and viscosity of muscle-tendon-unit are also relevant for describing resistance to passive movement.
conclusionIn order to provide relevant clinical and physiological information, future modeling should include supraspinal mechanisms in-depth, use image-based data to personalize non-neural parameters, specify models according to etiology and tasks, especially the active tasks of daily life activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.