Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40367071›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Neuromusculoskeletal modeling of spasticity: A scoping review.

Verônica Andrade da Silva, Rafael Lucio da Silva, Joseana Wendling Withers, Kátia Janine Veiga Massenz, Maria Isabel Veras Orselli, Luciano Luporini Menegaldo, Elisangela Ferretti Manffra

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Verônica Andrade da SilvaHealth Technology Graduate Program, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-5226
Rafael Lucio da SilvaHealth Technology Graduate Program, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Joseana Wendling WithersHealth Technology Graduate Program, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Kátia Janine Veiga MassenzHealth Technology Graduate Program, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Maria Isabel Veras OrselliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciano Luporini MenegaldoBiomedical Engineering Program, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Elisangela Ferretti ManffraHealth Technology Graduate Program, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis scoping review aimed to provide an overview of neuromusculoskeletal models used to investigate the mechanisms underlying spasticity and identify issues to be addressed in future models. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines and searched four bibliographic databases (PubMed, Compendex Engineering Village, IEEE Xplore, and Science Direct). Inclusion criteria were original studies written in English that investigated the underlying mechanisms of spasticity in humans with no age restrictions. Two independent reviewers selected studies.

resultsEighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Stroke was the neurological condition addressed by most studies, followed by cerebral palsy. The studies focused mainly on passive tasks with the knee joint as the primary target. All studies considered that spasticity was associated with alterations in the stretch reflex loop. Among the parameters tested by the studies, the reflex gains and thresholds were the parameters that could better represent levels of severity or effects of botulinum toxin type-A treatment. Recent studies proposed that stretching acceleration, muscle force, and force rate could be fed back into the feedback loop besides the muscle length and stretching velocity. However, no consensus was found among them. Finally, it has been that stiffness and viscosity of muscle-tendon-unit are also relevant for describing resistance to passive movement.

conclusionIn order to provide relevant clinical and physiological information, future modeling should include supraspinal mechanisms in-depth, use image-based data to personalize non-neural parameters, specify models according to etiology and tasks, especially the active tasks of daily life activities.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalMuscle, SkeletalMuscle SpasticityCerebral PalsyHumansReflex, Stretch

Identifiers

PMID40367071
PMCPMC12077711

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.