Evidence mapPaperPMID 40367089Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The role of AI in reducing maternal mortality: Current impacts and future potentials: Protocol for an analytical cross-sectional study.

Patrick O Owoche, Morris Senghor Shisanya, Betty Mayeku, Lucy Natecho Namusonge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Proceedings from the CIHBMC proceedings · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Using artificial intelligence as a technological tool in gynecologic and obstetric health: A narrative literature review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick O OwocheSchool of Computing and Informatics, Kibabii University, Bungoma, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2400-9192
Morris Senghor ShisanyaSchool of Nursing, Kibabii University, Bungoma, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4425-6249
Betty MayekuSchool of Computing and Informatics, Kibabii University, Bungoma, Kenya.
Lucy Natecho NamusongeSchool of Nursing, Kibabii University, Bungoma, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal and newborn mortality remains a critical public health challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings. Despite global efforts, Kenya continues to report high maternal mortality rates of over 350 deaths per 100,000 live births and a neonatal mortality rate of 21 per 1,000 live births. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled maternal healthcare interventions, such as Obstetric Point-of-Care Ultrasound (OPOCUS) and AI-driven SMS intervention on Promoting Mothers through Pregnancy and Postpartum (PROMPTS), offer innovative solutions to improve early detection, diagnosis, and maternal health-seeking behaviors. However, there is limited evidence on their usability, feasibility, and impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

objectiveThis study aims to assess the implementation, user experiences, and impact of OPOCUS and PROMPTS on maternal and neonatal health outcomes in Kenya. Specifically, it evaluates their effectiveness in reducing maternal complications, improving antenatal and postnatal care utilization, and enhancing clinical decision-making while identifying potential barriers to adoption and scalability.

methodsThis mixed-methods, cross-sectional study will be conducted in ten counties in Kenya that have integrated AI-based maternal healthcare interventions. Quantitative data will be collected from health facility records, national health databases (KHIS), and structured surveys, while qualitative data will be gathered through key informant interviews (KIIs) with healthcare providers and policymakers, as well as focus group discussions (FGDs) with maternal health service users. Statistical analyses will include comparative pre- and post-AI implementation assessments, with thematic analysis for qualitative insights. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: The study will generate empirical evidence on the feasibility, effectiveness, and barriers to AI integration in maternal health services. Findings will inform policy recommendations, enhance AI-assisted maternal healthcare design, and support the scaling of AI-driven interventions to improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes in Kenya and other low-resource settings.

conclusionAI-based maternal health interventions hold promise for reducing maternal mortality, improving diagnostic accuracy, and enhancing health-seeking behaviors. However, their success depends on user experiences, healthcare system readiness, and policy alignment. This study will provide critical insights for evidence-based scaling and policy integration of AI in maternal healthcare.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMaternal MortalityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornKenyaMaternal Health ServicesPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40367089
PMCPMC12077708

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.