ArticlePloS one2025
Predicting depression severity using machine learning models: Insights from mitochondrial peptides and clinical factors.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low Dose Ketamine Preconditions Astrocyte Mitochondria to Achieve Antidepressant Efficacy via Adenosine, Humanin, and Melatonin Upregulation and Efflux.Alpha psychiatry · 2026Article
- An inflammatory biomarker panel for prediabetes classification using interpretable machine learning.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression presents a significant challenge to global mental health, often intertwined with factors including oxidative stress. Although the precise relationship with mitochondrial pathways remains elusive, recent advances in machine learning present an avenue for further investigation. This study employed advanced machine learning techniques to classify major depressive disorders based on clinical indicators and mitochondrial oxidative stress markers. Six machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, were applied and their performance was investigated in balanced and unbalanced data sets with respect to binary and multiclass classification scenarios. Results indicate promising accuracy and precision, particularly with Random Forest on balanced data. RF achieved an average accuracy of 92.7% and an F1 score of 83.95% for binary classification, 90.36% and 90.1%, respectively, for the classification of three classes of severity of depression and 89.76% and 88.26%, respectively, for the classification of five classes. Including only oxidative stress markers resulted in accuracy and an F1 score of 79.52% and 80.56%, respectively. Notably, including mitochondrial peptides alongside clinical factors significantly enhances predictive capability, shedding light on the interplay between depression severity and mitochondrial oxidative stress pathways. These findings underscore the potential for machine learning models to aid clinical assessment, particularly in individuals with comorbid conditions such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.