Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40368352›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025

Potential drawbacks of manual aspiration with filter devices in carotid artery stenting.

Yuya Kobayashi, Chinami Yuzawa, Minori Kurashina, Yusaku Shimizu, Yoshiki Hanaoka, Atsushi Sato, Kazuhiro Hongo, Yoshiki Sekijima

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuya KobayashiDepartment of Neurology, Ina Central Hospital, Ina, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3447-4410
Chinami YuzawaDepartment of Neurology, Ina Central Hospital, Ina, Japan.
Minori KurashinaDepartment of Neurology, Ina Central Hospital, Ina, Japan.
Yusaku ShimizuDepartment of Neurology, Ina Central Hospital, Ina, Japan.
Yoshiki HanaokaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ina Central Hospital, Ina, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9288-1612
Atsushi SatoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ina Central Hospital, Ina, Japan.
Kazuhiro HongoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ina Central Hospital, Ina, Japan.
Yoshiki SekijimaDepartment of Medicine (Neurology & Rheumatology), Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundCarotid artery stenting (CAS) is a recognized intervention for preventing atherothrombotic cerebral infarction in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis. Although filter protection systems are used to prevent the migration of distal debris during CAS, in combination with manual aspiration and flow reversal systems, their behavior under retrograde blood flow remains poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the filter behavior under various flow conditions in CAS.MethodsAn

Indexed as

Antegrade flowcarotid artery stentingdebrisfilterretrograde flow

Identifiers

PMID40368352
PMCPMC12079182

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.