Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40368956›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Association between serum anion gap and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with Gastrointestinal bleeding: insights from MIMIC-IV database.

Jianwei Liu, Gege Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jianwei LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Shandong University, Qingdao, China. liujianwei567@163.com.
Gege FengDepartment of Hematology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serum anion gap (AG) holds potential for clinical application in the prognostic assessment of ill patients. Yet its association with all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) remains underexplored. This cohort study analyzed data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database, 2,333 critically ill GIB patients, recording their first-time AG levels. The relationship between AG, ICU mortality, and 90-day mortality in GIB patients was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curve, and COX regression model. Restricted cubic splines and subgroup analysis were conducted to enhance the stability and reliability of the findings. A total of 2,333 patients diagnosed with GIB were included in the study. The overall ICU and 90-day mortality in the entire cohort were 9.17% and 27.73%, respectively. KM analysis revealed a significant relationship between high AG and the risk of all-cause mortality (log-rank P < 0.001). After adjusting for all confounders, the association between AG and ICU and 90-day all-cause mortality was significant (HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.03-1.12; HR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04-1.09, separately). Furthermore, we assessed the potential linear relationship between AG and all-cause mortality (P for non-linearity > 0.05). Subsequent subgroup analysis demonstrated that weight and heart failure could impact the association between the two. AG emerges as a significant biomarker, closely associated with heightened ICU and 90-day mortality in individuals suffering from GIB.

Indexed as

Acid-Base EquilibriumCritical IllnessGastrointestinal HemorrhageAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsAll-cause mortalityAnion gapGastrointestinal bleedingMIMIC-IV

Identifiers

PMID40368956
PMCPMC12078518

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.