ReviewEye (London, England)2025
Retinal optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) biomarkers of cardiovascular disease: a review article.
Review in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iridology: Biological plausibility, clinical evidence, and implications for ophthalmic practice : A position paper of the Associazione Pazienti Malattie Oculari (APMO).Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Advancing Brain and Body Vascular Imaging in Bipolar Disorder: A Report From the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Vascular Task Force.Bipolar disorders · 2026Review
- Improved method for optical coherence tomography angiography: from reconstruction to clinical indicator quantification.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- The value of retinal microvascular features in predicting risk stratification and long-term prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review article systematically assesses existing literature on studies employing retinal optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) metrics as surrogate biomarkers for cardiovascular disease. A comprehensive, literature review of published peer-reviewed research was conducted within PubMed utilizing the following medical subject headings (MeSH) terms: "optical coherence tomography", "cardiovascular diseases", "retina", and "retinal vessels". A total of 840 articles were reviewed and selectively filtered with ultimately 50 articles being included. This review article elucidates key findings, identifies limitations, and pinpoints gaps within these investigations. Additionally, this article delineates constraints related to OCTA technology and image processing that presently hinder the widespread adoption of this promising technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.