SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Bidirectional association between cardiovascular disease and hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Endothelial Dysfunction in Fracture Healing: Mechanisms and Potential Effects on Skeletal Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Management and optimisation in the preoperative phase for patients with a fractured hip.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Heart Failure but Not Myocardial Infarction Is Causing Bone Loss in Rodent Models in an FGF23-Independent Manner.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to comprehensively analyze the bidirectional association between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and hip fracture (HF).
methodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for relevant studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the risk of bias. We conducted random effects model for meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of different ethnic groups. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias of this study were also evaluated. This study followed the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
resultsThis research included 18 cohort studies and case-control studies with a total sample of 1,854,441 individuals. The results showed ischemic heart disease might increase the risk of HF (OR = 1.41, 95%CI[1.05, 1.89], I
conclusionsThis study supports possible bidirectional associations between CVD and HF, but more mechanistic studies of CVD and HF were warranted. However, high heterogeneity and potential confounding by unmeasured variables warrant cautious interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.