ArticleBMC women's health2025
A non-randomized study of sexual health education on the sexual function of primigravid women.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSexual function is a particularly important aspect of pregnant women's lives that can affect mental health and family cohesion.
aimThis study aimed to determine the effect of sexual health education on sexual function in primigravida women.
methodsIn a non-randomized study, primigravida women were divided into an intervention group (n = 43) and a control group (n = 43). The intervention group participated in six 60-minute sex education sessions, while the control group received no intervention. Both groups were monitored for 8 weeks. Sexual function was evaluated using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire before the intervention, at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks post-intervention.
resultsUltimately, data from 80 patients were analyzed. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of demographic and pre-intervention clinical characteristics. At the 4-week mark post-intervention, there was no statistically significant difference observed in the average score of the overall index of sexual performance between the pregnant women in the two groups. However, upon comparing sexual function before intervention and at 4 and 8 weeks after intervention, significant improvements were noted in desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain subscale scores within the intervention group (p < 0.001). Conversely, in the control group, desire (psychological interest or motivation), arousal (physiological and emotional readiness), lubrication, and satisfaction subscale scores decreased, while the pain subscale score slightly increased between pre-intervention and the 8-week follow-up. The mean difference in the overall FSFI score before and 8 weeks after the intervention was notably higher in the intervention group (7.37 points) compared to the control group (-0.87 points (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe findings of this study highlight the transformative impact of sexual health education during pregnancy. By dispelling misconceptions and enriching knowledge, such interventions have the potential to enhance the sexual function of pregnant women significantly. These results underscore the effectiveness of integrating sexual health education into routine prenatal care, emphasizing its pivotal role in promoting the overall well-being of primiparous pregnant women.
trial registrationThis study retrospectively registered with the Iranian Clinical of Trials Registry with IRCT registration number IRCT20090810002324N20 (08-04-2025) ( https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/82382 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.