ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Changes in postural stability induced by a ball-and-board game designed from a systems perspective.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPostural behavior can be understood from a systems perspective, emerging from complex interactions within the agent's body system and the agent-environment system, where inherent variability enables adaptive and functional solutions to balance perturbations. Recent studies have recommended that lower limbs rehabilitation programs should be addressed from a systems perspective for both clinical assessment and intervention. In this context, we designed a ball-and-board game that fosters interactions between the lower limbs and between the agents through informational and mechanical couplings. The present paper aims to investigate whether such a game - designed from a systems perspective - has an impact on an agent's postural stability - using variability measures - also derived from a systems perspective.
methodsTwenty-four novice participants were randomly assigned to twelve dyads to perform our game, which consists in a joint-action task where two participants stand on an unstable surface (BOSU) while jointly manipulating a board on which a ball rolls along a circular target. Body and ball's three-dimensional movements were obtained using an 8-camera motion capture system. Postural stability was assessed using both linear and nonlinear measures, which respectively capture the amount and structure of variability in the center of mass' kinematics. Additional between-subject analyses were conducted to study relationships between postural stability and task performance.
resultsDespite the heterogeneous postural pathway of the participants, significant postural changes occurred with practice (i.e., decreased standard deviation and increased sample entropy of postural oscillation variability) in the anteroposterior plane, which is also the plane of motion where the knee joint is predominantly engaged through flexion-extension movements. Participants with higher performance were characterized by a greater complexity in their postural oscillations (i.e., greater sample entropy), allowing an increased ability to resist to perturbations that threaten postural stability.
conclusionsThe amount of variability in postural oscillations evolved heterogeneously across participants, which suggests a broad exploration of different postural solutions and therefore an enhanced adaptability to balance perturbations. This adaptability was particularly evident in participants with higher performance, whose postural oscillations exhibited a less periodic, and thus more complex, variability structure. In conclusion, our game led to a postural reorganization that encourages us to test it in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.