ReviewJournal of cannabis research2025
Use of industrial hemp byproducts in ruminants: a review of the nutritional profile, animal response, constraints, and global regulatory environment.
Review in Journal of cannabis research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Assessment of the Canine Fecal Microbiota in Response to Dietary Hempseed By-Product and Oil: A 90-Day Nutritional Intervention Study.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Nutritive Value and Cannabinoid Potency of Diverse Hemp (Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026Article
- Combination of red and UV-A light enhances hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) inflorescence yield and cannabinoid content.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe legalization of industrial hemp, Cannabis sativa L., which contains < 0.3% ∆
methodWe provide an overview of the nutritional characteristics of the various hemp byproducts and provide a meta-analysis of 26 empirical studies investigating the use of hemp byproducts on ruminants. Using those studies, we delved into a comprehensive assessment regarding the effects of HSB and SHB on the health and performance of the animals.
resultsOverall, HSB and SHB possess excellent nutritional profiles due to their high protein content and, particularly for HSB, desirable fatty acids profile can partially replace protein-source ingredients such as soybean meal, dried distillers' grains with soluble, canola meal, and alfalfa in the diets of ruminants. These byproducts contain diverse phytochemicals with antioxidants, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties. Data do not reveal any significant concern for the health of the animals fed hemp byproducts and, with few exceptions, the data do not indicate a substantial effect on performance; dietary inclusion of HSB, however, has a deleterious impact on rumen fermentation and nutrient digestibility when given as raw HSB without dehulling, reducing the growth performance of meat-producing ruminants. On the other hand, SHB has low palatability overall but does not impair production performance.
conclusionsAlthough they can be promising feed ingredients for ruminants, their present use as feed ingredients is limited by the residuals of THC and CBD. Our comprehensive review of the current legal status of hemp byproducts worldwide highlighted a complex scenario with some countries allowing the use of hemp byproducts as feed ingredients, some with no clear regulations, and some countries where a path for the regulation has started, such as the US. Still, no hemp byproducts are yet legal as a feed ingredient for ruminants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.