ArticleThe plant genome2025
Genomic prediction in Persian walnut: Optimization levers according to genetic architecture of complex traits.
Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic prediction in Persian walnut: Optimization levers according to genetic architecture of complex traits.The plant genome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.) is a widespread cultivated nut tree species in temperate regions. Advances in genomic tools, such as the high-density Axiom J. regia 700K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping array, enable the exploration of genomic prediction (GP) for this crop. This study is the first to evaluate GP accuracy and several influencing factors in walnut for traits related to phenology and nut quality. A core-collection of 170 accessions was phenotyped for 25 traits over 1 or 2 years. Highly heritable traits, such as budbreak date and female flowering date, were predicted with high accuracy (∼0.75) using ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (rrBLUP). Three key factors influencing GP performance were examined: marker density, prediction model, and training set size. Selecting the top 1% of 364,275 SNPs based on their variance (∼3600 SNPs) was sufficient to achieve accurate predictions. Bayesian models slightly improved prediction accuracy for some traits when using this reduced SNP set, but rrBLUP provided robust results, balancing accuracy, simplicity, and computational efficiency. Training population size also influenced accuracy, with a subset comprising 50% of the population still yielding reliable predictions. Optimization of training set was assessed using coefficient of determination mean, prediction error variance mean, and mean relatedness (MeanRel) parameters, with MeanRel performing best for shell traits. However, incorporating SNPs identified in genome-wide association study into the prediction models did not enhance accuracy. In summary, this study demonstrates the feasibility and potential of GPs for walnut breeding programs using a core-collection, offering valuable insights for optimizing GP approaches in this crop.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.