ArticleExperimental physiology2025
Integrative cardiovascular dose-response to graded lower-body negative pressure.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex-based differences in central and cerebral hemodynamic responses to lower body negative pressure (LBNP): an experimental study.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Dose-dependent effects of graded altered gravity during hypovolaemia on central haemodynamics and cardiovascular autonomic regulation.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular response to altered gravity in healthy adults: Insight from graded tilt testing.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Integrative cardiovascular dose-response to graded lower-body negative pressure.Experimental physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) has been posited as a potential spaceflight countermeasure to counteract the physiological deconditioning related to fluid shifts in microgravity. However, open questions remain regarding the magnitude of LBNP that should be applied. We systematically characterized the cardiovascular effects of LBNP and quantified the effect size of varied LBNP doses across different parts of the cardiovascular system. Twenty-four subjects (12 male and 12 female) were exposed to graded LBNP, increasing from 0 to -50 mmHg in 10 mmHg increments, in both supine (0°) and 15° head-down tilt postures. At each pressure level, subjects first underwent a 6 min stabilization period to reach a steady-state cardiovascular response. We then assessed a wide range of variables, including those related to the systemic circulation, cardiovascular control, and haemodynamics of the eyes and neck. Building on the experimental data, dose-response curves were constructed using a Bayesian multivariate hierarchical modelling framework to quantify the effect size of every variable considered when subjected to LBNP. The methodology allows direct comparison of the variables and the underlying structural relationships between them. Furthermore, we demonstrated the potential for LBNP to reduce jugular venous flow stagnation, which is considered one of the major health risks during human spaceflight. The dose-response curves and effect sizes generated from this research effort establish the most comprehensive framework available to date that characterizes physiological responses to LBNP. These results directly inform the development of countermeasures to mitigate the negative effects of spaceflight, including cardiovascular deconditioning, spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome and venous thromboembolism events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.