Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40370016›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Seeking consensus on the domestication concept.

Robert N Spengler, Li Tang, Marta Dal Corso, Rosalind Emma Gillis, Hugo Rafael Oliveira, Basira Mir Makhamad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring the role of plant-animal interactions in the long-term development of heritage landscapes in Europe.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Unravelling domestication: introduction to the theme issue.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Seeking consensus on the domestication concept.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert N SpenglerDomestication and Anthropogenic Evolution Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Geoanthropology, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5648-6930
Li TangDomestication and Anthropogenic Evolution Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Geoanthropology, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Marta Dal CorsoDepartment of Geosciences, Università degli Studi di Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2307-0613
Rosalind Emma GillisReferat Naturwissenschaften, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, 14199 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2370-7311
Hugo Rafael OliveiraICArEHB, University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
Basira Mir MakhamadDomestication and Anthropogenic Evolution Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Geoanthropology, 07745 Jena, Germany.

Funding

H2020 European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domestication of plants and animals permitted the development of cities and social hierarchies, as well as fostering cultural changes that ultimately led humanity into the modern world. Despite the importance of this set of related evolutionary phenomena, scholars have not reached a consensus on what the earliest steps in the domestication process looked like, how long the seminal portions of the process took to unfold, or whether humans played a conscious role in parts or all of it. Likewise, many scholars find it difficult to disentangle the cultural processes of cultivation from the biological processes of domestication. Over the past decade, the prevailing views among scholars have begun to shift towards unconscious and protracted models of early domestication; however, the nomenclature used to discuss these changes has been stagnant. Discussions of early domestication remain bound up in prevailing definitions and preconceived ideas of what the process looked like. In this paper, we seek to break down definitions of domestication and to construct a definition that serves equal utility regardless of the views that researchers hold about the process.This article is part of the theme issue 'Unravelling domestication: multi-disciplinary perspectives on human and non-human relationships in the past, present and future'.

Indexed as

DomesticationAnimalsBiological EvolutionConsensusHumansarchaeologycultivationdomesticationorigins of agriculture

Identifiers

PMID40370016
PMCPMC12079131

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.