ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
Domestication effects on crowing in chickens: variation between wild and captive red junglefowl and domestic white Leghorn and the genetic architecture of crowing vocalizations.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Domestication effects on crowing in chickens: variation between wild and captive red junglefowl and domestic white Leghorn and the genetic architecture of crowing vocalizations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Unravelling domestication: introduction to the theme issue.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The crowing of the male chicken is a charismatic example of vocal display in a bird. It is regarded as the main territorial announcement of the ancestral red junglefowl. The call has been preserved throughout domestication, although several of its elements have been altered. To assess these alterations, we assayed crowing spectrograms from wild and captive-held red junglefowl populations from India, along with two red junglefowl populations held in long-term captivity in Sweden, and a domestic white Leghorn breed. We find consistent differences between the different Indian red junglefowl and the domestic white Leghorn for a range of characteristics, including the duration of the last syllable and the number of formants and their frequency in the last and second-to-last syllable. To analyse the genetic architecture of crowing vocalization, we performed a quantitative trait loci (QTL) experiment using a wild × domestic advanced intercross to identify QTL that explained a large percentage of the variation present for the duration of the last syllable and the number of formants in the second to last syllable. With this study we thus demonstrate consistent differences in red junglefowl and white Leghorn chickens and identify a relatively simple genetic architecture for some of these traits.This article is part of the theme issue 'Unravelling domestication: multi-disciplinary perspectives on human and non-human relationships in the past, present and future'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.