ReviewJournal of sleep research2025
The Future of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Sleep Medicine.
Review in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for insomnia disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Skin-attached bioadhesive patch enabling ultrasound deep brain stimulation and real-time electrophysiological monitoring for REM sleep enhancement.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on state and trait anxiety among undergraduates with insomnia symptoms: a randomized control trial.BMC psychology · 2026Trial
- Magnetoelectric Nanoparticles Enable Modulation of Cortical Networks by Low-Intensity Static Magnetic Fields In Vitro.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- rTMS for rapid relief of sleep disorders induced by influenza virus infection: a clinical retrospective study.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Non-invasive electrical stimulation for sleep disturbances in adults: protocol for an evidence-mapping umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses with subgroup analysis by intervention type and population.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Differences in sleep spindles and polysomnography in humans: a meta-analysis on the influence of age, sex, and cognitive ability.Frontiers in sleep · 2026Review
- Sleep and Dreams as Reflected by Science Fiction Literature and Films-Anything to Learn From?Journal of sleep research · 2025Review
- The Future of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Sleep Medicine.Journal of sleep research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) methods carry particular appeal as non-pharmacological approaches to inducing or improving sleep. However, intense research efforts to use transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation (tES) for sleep modulation have not yet delivered evidence-based NIBS treatments in sleep medicine. The main obstacles lie in insufficiently robust stimulation protocols that affect neurophysiological and self-reported sleep parameters, inadequately controlled-and explained-placebo effects, and heterogeneity in patient populations and outcome parameters. Recent technological advances, e.g., transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) and temporal interference stimulation (TIS), make deep brain structures feasible targets. Real-time approaches, e.g., closed-loop auditory stimulation (CLAS), demonstrate efficacious modulation of different sleep oscillations by tuning stimulation to ongoing brain activity. The identification of sleep-regulatory regions and cell types in the cerebral cortex and thalamus provides new specific targets. To turn this neuroscientific progress into therapeutic advancement, conceptual reframing is warranted. Chronic insomnia may not be optimally suited to demonstrate NIBS efficacy due to the mismatch between self-reported symptoms and polysomnographic sleep parameters. More feasible initial approaches could be to (1) modulate specific sleep oscillations to promote specific sleep functions, (2) modify nightmares and traumatic memories with targeted memory reactivation, (3) increase 'wake intensity' in patients with depression to improve daytime fatigue and elevate sleep pressure and (4) disrupt pathological activity in sleep-dependent epilepsies. Effective treatments in these areas of sleep medicine seem in reach but require rigorously designed clinical trials to identify which NIBS strategies bring real benefit in sleep medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.