Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40370279›Full record

ReviewJournal of sleep research2025

The Future of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Sleep Medicine.

Lukas B Krone, Seo Ho Song, Valeria Jaramillo, Ines R Violante

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lukas B KroneCentre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5535-7221
Seo Ho SongDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2970-2746
Valeria JaramilloSurrey Sleep Research Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1446-8328
Ines R ViolanteSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4787-2901

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/Y011856/1Exeter College OxfordWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 224083/Z/21/ZWellcome Trust 301007/Z/23/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) methods carry particular appeal as non-pharmacological approaches to inducing or improving sleep. However, intense research efforts to use transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation (tES) for sleep modulation have not yet delivered evidence-based NIBS treatments in sleep medicine. The main obstacles lie in insufficiently robust stimulation protocols that affect neurophysiological and self-reported sleep parameters, inadequately controlled-and explained-placebo effects, and heterogeneity in patient populations and outcome parameters. Recent technological advances, e.g., transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) and temporal interference stimulation (TIS), make deep brain structures feasible targets. Real-time approaches, e.g., closed-loop auditory stimulation (CLAS), demonstrate efficacious modulation of different sleep oscillations by tuning stimulation to ongoing brain activity. The identification of sleep-regulatory regions and cell types in the cerebral cortex and thalamus provides new specific targets. To turn this neuroscientific progress into therapeutic advancement, conceptual reframing is warranted. Chronic insomnia may not be optimally suited to demonstrate NIBS efficacy due to the mismatch between self-reported symptoms and polysomnographic sleep parameters. More feasible initial approaches could be to (1) modulate specific sleep oscillations to promote specific sleep functions, (2) modify nightmares and traumatic memories with targeted memory reactivation, (3) increase 'wake intensity' in patients with depression to improve daytime fatigue and elevate sleep pressure and (4) disrupt pathological activity in sleep-dependent epilepsies. Effective treatments in these areas of sleep medicine seem in reach but require rigorously designed clinical trials to identify which NIBS strategies bring real benefit in sleep medicine.

Indexed as

BrainDeep Brain StimulationSleepSleep Wake DisordersTranscranial Magnetic StimulationHumansSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersTranscranial Direct Current Stimulationneuromodulationsleep disorderssleep interventionssleep treatment

Identifiers

PMID40370279
PMCPMC12426730

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.