ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
The quest for blood pressure markers in photoplethysmography and its applications in digital health.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comparative Study of Signal Representations Methods and Deep Learning Architectures for PPG-Based Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Continuous assessment and research on enhanced blood pressure control - CareBP study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors, capturing optical signals from arterial pulses, are debated for their potential in blood pressure (BP) measurement. This study employed the largest dataset to date of paired PPG and cuff BP readings to explore PPG signals for BP estimation. Methods: 32,152 European residents (age 55.9% ± 11.8, 24% female, BMI 27.7 ± 4.6) voluntarily acquired and used a cuffless BP monitor (Aktiia SA, Switzerland) between March/2,021-March/2023. Systolic and diastolic BP (SBP, DBP) from an upper arm oscillometric cuff were collected simultaneously with wrist PPG (668,080 paired measurements). Six different machine learning models were developed to predict BP using cuff BP readings as reference (75%|15%|15% training|validation|testing): four baseline models [heart rate (HR), Age, Demography (DEM: Age + Gender + BMI), DEM + HR], and two models relying on the analysis of the PPG waveforms (PPG, PPG + DEM). Performance of each model was evaluated on the 4,823 subjects from the testing set using as metrics the Pearson's correlation (r) when comparing the estimated and the reference BP values, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves, and true positive and true negative rates (TPR, TNR) for the detection of high BP (reference SBP ≥ 140 or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg, applying a ± 8 mmHg exclusion zone to account for cuff measurement uncertainty). Results: Baseline models showed low correlation with cuff data and poor high BP detection ( Discussion: This study demonstrated that PPG signals contain reliable markers of BP, and that BP values can be estimated using only markers found within PPG's optical pulsatility signals, outperforming models based solely on demographic data. These findings hold the potential to radically transform hypertension screening and global healthcare delivery, paving the way for innovative approaches in patient diagnosis, monitoring and treatment methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.