Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371097›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2025

A Guide for Developing Demo-Genetic Models to Simulate Genetic Rescue.

Julian E Beaman, Katie Gates, Frédérik Saltré, Carolyn J Hogg, Katherine Belov, Kita Ashman, Karen Burke da Silva, Luciano B Beheregaray, Corey J A Bradshaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic Rescue: Latest Advances and Applications.Evolutionary applications · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julian E BeamanGlobal Ecology | Partuyarta Ngadluku Wardli Kuu, College of Science and Engineering Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1618-5308
Katie GatesMolecular Ecology Laboratory, College of Science and Engineering Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3410-7909
Frédérik SaltréGlobal Ecology | Partuyarta Ngadluku Wardli Kuu, College of Science and Engineering Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5040-3911
Carolyn J HoggSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6328-398X
Katherine BelovSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9762-5554
Kita AshmanWorld Wide Fund for Nature Australia Melbourne Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-6318
Karen Burke da SilvaConservation and Symbiosis Lab, College of Science and Engineering Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0294-6583
Luciano B BeheregarayMolecular Ecology Laboratory, College of Science and Engineering Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0944-3003
Corey J A BradshawGlobal Ecology | Partuyarta Ngadluku Wardli Kuu, College of Science and Engineering Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5328-7741

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic rescue is a conservation management strategy that reduces the negative effects of genetic drift and inbreeding in small and isolated populations. However, such populations might already be vulnerable to random fluctuations in growth rates (demographic stochasticity). Therefore, the success of genetic rescue depends not only on the genetic composition of the source and target populations but also on the emergent outcome of interacting demographic processes and other stochastic events. Developing predictive models that account for feedback between demographic and genetic processes ('demo-genetic feedback') is therefore necessary to guide the implementation of genetic rescue to minimize the risk of extinction of threatened populations. Here, we explain how the mutual reinforcement of genetic drift, inbreeding, and demographic stochasticity increases extinction risk in small populations. We then describe how these processes can be modelled by parameterizing underlying mechanisms, including deleterious mutations with partial dominance and demographic rates with variances that increase as abundance declines. We combine our suggestions of model parameterization with a comparison of the relevant capability and flexibility of five open-source programs designed for building genetically explicit, individual-based simulations. Using one of the programs, we provide a heuristic model to demonstrate that simulated genetic rescue can delay extinction of small virtual populations that would otherwise be exposed to greater extinction risk due to demo-genetic feedback. We then use a case study of threatened Australian marsupials to demonstrate that published genetic data can be used in one or all stages of model development and application, including parameterization, calibration, and validation. We highlight that genetic rescue can be simulated with either virtual or empirical sequence variation (or a hybrid approach) and suggest that model-based decision-making should be informed by ranking the sensitivity of predicted probability/time to extinction to variation in model parameters (e.g., translocation size, frequency, source populations) among different genetic-rescue scenarios.

Indexed as

conservation geneticsdemographydensity feedbackinbreeding depressionmarsupialsSLiMsoftware

Identifiers

PMID40371097
PMCPMC12076008

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.