ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2025
Bioleaching of uranium from ores and rocks using filamentous fungi.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Heterotrophic bacterial bioleaching and sequestration of uranium from mineral resources: a review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to review the role of filamentous fungi in the leaching of uranium from ores and rocks. Fungi produce short-chain fatty acids through the fermentation and partial oxidation of organic compounds. Biomass can be separated from the culture, while organic acids in spent media dissolve and sequester uranium from minerals in ores and rocks. Oxide, carbonate, and silicate ores containing hexavalent uranium are suitable for this treatment. Fungi can maximize the production of short-chain fatty acids. Uranium dissolution and sequestration are attributed mostly to the formation of soluble U(VI)-carboxylate complexes with citric and oxalic acids, although other carboxylic acids can also sequester uranium. The leach solutions maintain a pH level between 1.5 and 3.5, as the low pH facilitates proton attack on the minerals and minimizes the precipitation of metals in the leach solution. Two types of uranium leaching processes using fungi have been tested: one-step leaching, where biomass is not separated before contact with the uranium mineral, and two-step leaching, which employs spent medium after the removal of fungal biomass. Process optimization to the pilot stage has not yet been reported in the literature. To date, this article is the first to review the role of filamentous fungi in uranium bioleaching from ores and rocks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.