ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2025
Predictive role of peripheral blood indicators in the prognosis of patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of response and survival in cemiplimab-treated cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: multicenter real-world evidence from Germany.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the predictive role of peripheral blood indicators in the prognosis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Clinical data of 139 cSCC patients receiving ICIs treatment were retrospectively collected. Peripheral blood indicators, including blood cell counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), liver and kidney function markers, and inflammation markers, were examined. A binary logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors for non-response to ICIs, and a predictive model was constructed. Additionally, multiple linear regression and Pearson correlation analysis were employed to assess relevant influences and relationships. Results showed that immunotherapy timing, lymphocyte count, NLR, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were influencing factors for non-response to ICIs (all P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for these indicators in predicting non-response risk was 0.651 (95% CI: 0.529-0.773), 0.671 (95% CI: 0.542-0.801), 0.775 (95% CI: 0.682-0.868), and 0.717 (95% CI: 0.573-0.861), respectively. The combined AUC of these four factors was 0.878 (95% CI: 0.790-0.966), with sensitivity and specificity of 76.0% and 93.0%, respectively. After internal verification, the constructed model exhibited predicted sensitivity and specificity of 80.00% and 94.29% respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that these four factors were independent predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) in cSCC patients. Immunotherapy timing, NLR, and CRP were negatively correlated with PFS (r = -0.235, -0.330, -0.494), while lymphocyte count was positively correlated with PFS (r = 0.326). In conclusion, peripheral blood indicators are valuable for predicting the response to ICIs in cSCC and can influence patients' PFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.