ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Region-specific neuroprotective effects of meldonium pretreatment in two models of sepsis-associated encephalopathy.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The in vivo disposition of mildronate and its regulatory effects on L-carnitine in rats.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Dissociation between gut microbiota remodeling and early gut-liver injury in CLP-induced sepsis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a common yet poorly understood complication of sepsis, which poses a burden in clinical settings, as its management relies on supportive care without targeted pharmacological interventions. Meldonium is a drug approved for ischemic heart disease but has also gained attention for its neuroprotective effects. In animal models of sepsis, meldonium pretreatment exerted antioxidative, antiapoptotic, and anti-inflammatory effects, but its neurological effects have not been studied in SAE. In the present study, rats were pretreated with meldonium for 4 weeks, before sepsis was induced via a faecal intraperitoneal injection (FIP) or a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection. The cerebellum, medulla oblongata, and prefrontal cortex were examined due to their involvement in functions that are often impaired in sepsis. Eight hours post-sepsis induction, markers of brain injury were assessed, including reflexes scores, dry to wet brain mass ratio, prooxidant-antioxidant balance (PAB), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), lipid peroxidation (LPO), phosphatidylcholine (PC) to lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) ratio, HMGB1 and haptoglobin protein expression, and CD73 activity. Meldonium-pretreated FIP-septic rats showed an earlier decline in reflex scores compared to the sepsis-only group, accompanied by a slight brain water accumulation. However, in both models of sepsis, meldonium pretreatment prevented alterations in the PAB, AOPP, and LPO in a region-specific manner. It also preserved the PC/LPC ratio in the prefrontal cortex of FIP-septic rats and in all regions of LPS-septic rats. Haptoglobin protein content was altered only in FIP-septic rats, and preserved by meldonium pretreatment in the cerebellum and medulla oblongata of these rats. Additionally, meldonium pretreatment preserved CD73 activity in the medulla oblongata and prefrontal cortex of FIP-septic rats and in the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex of LPS-septic rats. In conclusion, our study is the first to demonstrate that pretreatment with meldonium, a drug that has shown neuroprotective effects in other invasive models can also provide benefits in SAE, with the extent of protection depending on both the model of sepsis induction and the specific brain region investigated. Our findings support the discussion on the importance of selecting the right sepsis model and studying individual brain regions when investigating SAE and potential therapeutic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.