Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371769›Full record

ArticleWorld psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)2025

Bipolar II disorder: a state-of-the-art review.

Michael Berk, Asier Corrales, Roth Trisno, Seetal Dodd, Lakshmi N Yatham, Eduard Vieta, Roger S McIntyre, Trisha Suppes, Bruno Agustini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. The Regulatory Potential of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Bipolar Disorder.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael BerkInstitute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Asier CorralesDepartment of Psychiatry, Navarra University Hospital, Pamplona, Spain.
Roth TrisnoInstitute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Seetal DoddInstitute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Lakshmi N YathamDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Eduard VietaInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Roger S McIntyreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Trisha SuppesVA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Bruno AgustiniInstitute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bipolar II disorder (BD-II) is currently identified by both the DSM-5 and ICD-11 as a distinct subtype of bipolar disorder, defined by at least one depressive episode and at least one hypomanic episode, with no history of mania. Despite its prevalence and impact, the literature on BD-II remains relatively sparse. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the available research and current debate on the disorder, including its diagnostic criteria, clinical presentations, comorbidities, epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment strategies. Patients with BD-II often present with recurrent depressive episodes, which outnumber hypomanic episodes by a ratio of 39:1. The condition is therefore often misdiagnosed as major depressive disorder and treated with antidepressant monotherapy, which may worsen its prognosis. The recognition of BD-II is further complicated by the overlap of its symptoms with other disorders, in particular borderline personality disorder. Although BD-II is often perceived as a less severe form of bipolar disorder, evidence suggests significant functional and cognitive impairment, accompanied by an elevated risk of suicidal behavior, including a rate of completed suicide at least equivalent to that observed in bipolar I disorder (BD-I). Psychiatric comorbidities, in particular anxiety and substance use disorders, are common. The disorder is associated with a high prevalence of numerous physical comorbidities, with a particularly high risk of comorbid cardiovascular diseases. Various genetic and environmental risk factors have been identified. Inflammation, circadian rhythm dysregulation and mitochondrial dysfunction are being studied as potential pathophysiological mechanisms. Current treatment guidelines, often extrapolated from BD-I and depression research, may not fully address the unique aspects of BD-II. Nevertheless, substantial evidence supports the value of some pharmacological treatments - primarily mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics - augmented by psychoeducation, cognitive behavioral or interpersonal and social rhythm therapy, and lifestyle interventions. Further research on BD-II should be a priority, in order to refine diagnostic criteria, identify potentially modifiable risk factors, and develop targeted interventions.

Indexed as

Bipolar disorderbipolar II disorderborderline personality disorderdepressionhypomaniamisdiagnosismitochondrial dysfunctionmixed statesmood stabilizerspsychoeducationsuicidal behavior

Identifiers

PMID40371769
PMCPMC12079553

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.