ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2025
Post-COVID-Syndrome Patients Might Overestimate Own Cognitive Impairment.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Persistent Symptoms After SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Referred Occupational Clinical Registry: Symptom Patterns and Associated Factors.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAfter a COVID-19 infection, some patients experience long-term consequences known as Post-Covid Syndrome, which often includes cognitive impairment. We investigated the congruence between subjectively experienced and objectively measured cognitive deficits after a COVID-19 infection in an unselected, successively admitted cohort of 46 patients reporting subjective cognitive complaints (SCC).
methodsWe employed a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery to assess objective cognitive impairment across various cognitive domains. Three different cut-off criteria were applied, commonly used in the literature to define objective neurocognitive disorder (NCD).
resultsWe observed a notably low congruence between SCC and NCD in Post-Covid Syndrome, regardless of the cut-off criterion. Depending on the cognitive domain, only 4% to maximally 40% of the SCC could be objectified.
conclusionsOne possible explanation for this discrepancy could be the high rate of depressive symptoms observed in the group of patients studied, which may negatively influence the perception of one's cognitive abilities. These findings emphasize the need for careful evaluation of SCC in Post-Covid Syndrome and suggest that treating depressive symptoms may also alleviate some of the perceived cognitive deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.