SynthesisArchivos de cardiologia de Mexico2025
[Mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock associated with the use of microaxial flow pump: a systematic review and meta-analysis].
Synthesis in Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article we aim to evaluate the impact of the microaxial flow pump on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock associated with acute myocardial infarction through a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials and cohort studies. Patients with acute myocardial infarction, both with and without ST-segment elevation, associated with cardiogenic shock and treated with a microaxial flow pump, were included. Mortality data and implantation time of the device were reported. Patients with more than 24 hours of shock progression, those with other shock etiologies, patients with mechanical complications from acute myocardial infarction, and other comorbidity, were excluded. The search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science databases for articles published from 2019 until November 10, 2024. Risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB 2 tool and the ROBINS-E, while statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 software. A total of 1000 patients from five studies were included. The use of the microaxial flow pump was associated with a reduction in mortality compared to placebo (OR: 0.6; 95%CI: 0.42-0.85; p = 0.005). However, there were no significant differences in mortality related to the timing of the microaxial flow pump implantation (before, during, or after percutaneous coronary intervention) (OR: 0.85; 95%CI: 0.59-1.22; p = 0.37). Patients with cardiogenic shock have gained access to various treatment opportunities that were not available until recently. The results suggest that the microaxial flow pump is a therapeutic option in these patients with significant effects on mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.