ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2025
Associations between measures of oestrogen exposure and severity of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Morphological Features in Eyes with Prominent Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss Associated with Primary Angle-Closure Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo determine the associations between measures of oestrogen exposure and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) severity.
methodsClinic-based cross-sectional study of 32 postmenopausal women and 11 men with mild or severe FECD, age>55 years. Participants completed questionnaires for data on demographics, anthropometric factors, medical history and potential risk factors for FECD. Women completed an additional reproductive history questionnaire used to calculate the months of lifetime oestrogen exposure. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy, specular microscopy, corneal Scheimpflug tomography and laboratory testing (
results43 patients were enrolled in the study (mild FECD: 17 women, 3 men; severe FECD: 15 women, 8 men). Serum-free estradiol was higher in the severe compared with mild FECD group (0.21±0.2 vs 0.09±0.1 pg/mL; p=0.046). When stratified by sex, men showed no significant associations between oestrogen measures and FECD severity. However, in women, the odds of severe FECD were increased with more months of lifetime oestrogen exposure (all women; log OR (95% credible interval): 1.3 (0.14 to 4.3)), higher concentrations of free estradiol (all women; 2.1 (0.0049 to 10)), greater % free estradiol (only women without
conclusionsWhile the application of these data is constrained by the limited number of participants, a clinic-based sample, small number of men compared with women and single-point measures of serum hormone measures, these data suggest that FECD severity is associated with higher oestrogen exposures in women but not men and may be dependent on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.