ArticleBMJ open2025
Efficacy and safety of novel complement inhibitors in atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtypical Haemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS) is a rare but life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy. If inadequately managed, aHUS can lead to progressive kidney failure, cardiovascular complications and multiorgan dysfunction, resulting in high healthcare costs and a substantial impact on patients' quality of life. Novel complement inhibitors offer potential advantages, yet comprehensive evidence comparing their efficacy and safety is limited. This protocol elaborates the systematic review plans to evaluate the effectiveness and the drug safety of complement inhibitors in aHUS.
methodsA systematic search will be conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies include randomised controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies and case series with at least three aHUS patients treated with novel complement inhibitors. Two independent reviewers will perform data extraction and quality assessment using standardised tools, including the Risk of Bias Tool 2 for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. A meta-analysis will be conducted if feasible, utilising a random-effects model to account for study heterogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as only previously published data will be used. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conferences, targeting healthcare professionals and policymakers to support evidence-based decision-making in aHUS management. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42025629879.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.