Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40374312›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025

The pace and shape of ant ageing.

Luisa M Jaimes-Nino, Jan Oettler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luisa M Jaimes-NinoInstitute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University, Hanns-Dieter Hüsch Weg 15, Mainz, 55128, Germany.
Jan OettlerZoologie/Evolutionsbiologie, Universität Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 31, Regensburg, 93053, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft JA3614/1-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft OE549/2-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ants have been proposed as good models to study ageing and the effects of extrinsic mortality because of their long lifespans and plasticity of ageing within species. We discuss how age-dependent extrinsic mortality might influence queen lifespan, and how the effect of age-independent extrinsic mortality needs further study, accounting for different density-dependence scenarios. Based on a critical review of the available demographic data, we discuss the selective forces underlying ant ageing. We discuss differences and similarities between the life-history strategy of ants and the reproductive strategies iteroparity and semelparity. We consider how late-life fitness gains for the "superorganism" select for a delay of actuarial, and reproductive senescence, and we suggest future research directions.

Indexed as

AgingAntsAnimalsLongevityReproductioncontinuusparitylifespanreproductionsenescencesocial insects

Identifiers

PMID40374312
PMCPMC12407051

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.