Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40374657›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Drug distribution in dorsal root ganglion after peripheral application of Lidocaine patch.

Geng Xu, Yongji Zhai, Zhijun Yu, Yanpeng Liu, Yiping Huang, Zhanjie Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Geng XuDepartment of Pain Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, No.2428, Yuhe Road, 261041, Weifang, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Yongji ZhaiDepartment of Pain Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, No.2428, Yuhe Road, 261041, Weifang, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Zhijun YuInterventional Department, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Yanpeng LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of of Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Yiping HuangDepartment of Pain Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, No.2428, Yuhe Road, 261041, Weifang, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Zhanjie RenDepartment of Pain Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, No.2428, Yuhe Road, 261041, Weifang, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China. renzhanjie@sdsmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Weifang Municipal Health Commission WFWSJK-2023-002Weifang Weifang Science and Technology Bureau 2023GX032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated lidocaine distribution following patch application at peripheral position. The study included three parts. Animals in Part A (n = 12) were received 5% lidocaine patches on paravertebral (Group A1) or parasternal (Group A2) side, covering the distribution of the unilateral T3-T8 intercostal nerves. Part B (group B, n = 6) received bilateral patches along the T6-T8 intercostal nerve distribution. In Part C (n = 12), Group C1 severed the bilateral 5th-7th intercostal nerves followed by patch application approximately 0.5 cm lateral to the incisions, while Group C2 had the same patch placement without nerve cutting. All rabbits were euthanized 24 h after 5% lidocaine patch applied for 12 h. Dorsal root ganglia (DRG), fascia and spinal cord were collected. Lidocaine concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. Lidocaine concentration in the DRGs on the treated side of A1 was significantly higher than that of A2. A1 and A2 exhibited lower lidocaine concentrations in contralateral DRGs compared to the treated side. In Group B, lidocaine concentration in DRG was higher in T6-T8 segments than in T3-T5 segments, with no significant difference in spinal cord concentration between segments. Group C showed significantly lower DRG lidocaine concentration in C1 compared to C2, with a slight decrease in spinal cord lidocaine concentration in C1. Intercostal nerves are the primary pathway for lidocaine transport from the periphery to the DRGs. Lidocaine patches should be applied as close to the spine as possible.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalGanglia, SpinalLidocaineAnimalsMaleRabbitsSpinal CordTransdermal PatchAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineAdministration, topicalLidocaineTissue distributionTransdermal patch

Identifiers

PMID40374657
PMCPMC12081604

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.