ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating bioinformatics and machine learning to identify glomerular injury genes and predict drug targets in diabetic nephropathy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gene modification: Exploring the potential in treating kidney diseases.Pharmacological research · 2026Review
- Transcriptomic Signatures in IgA Nephropathy: From Renal Tissue to Precision Risk Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Multi-Omics Analysis and Nephroseq Database of Genes Related to Kidney Function in Diabetic Nephropathy Patients to Predict Potential Target Drugs.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Article
- Integrated bioinformatics and machine learning reveal pan-apoptosis and immune infiltration signatures in diabetic nephropathy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder that poses significant challenges to public health. Among its various complications, diabetic nephropathy (DN) emerges as a critical microvascular complication associated with high mortality rates. Despite the development of diverse therapeutic strategies targeting metabolic improvement, hemodynamic regulation, and fibrosis mitigation, the precise mechanisms responsible for glomerular injury in DN are not yet fully elucidated. To explore these mechanisms, public DN datasets (GSE30528, GSE104948, and GSE96804) were obtained from the GEO database. We merged the GSE30528 and GSE104948 datasets to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between DN and control groups using R software. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was subsequently employed to discern genes associated with DN in key modules. We utilized Venny software to pinpoint co-expressed genes shared between DEGs and key module genes. These co-expressed genes underwent gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses. Through LASSO, SVM, and RF methods, we isolated five significant genes: FN1, C1orf21, CD36, CD48, and SRPX2. These genes were further validated using a logistic model and 10-fold cross-validation. The external dataset GSE96804 served to validate the identified biomarkers, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis assessed their diagnostic efficacy for DN. Additionally, GSE104948 facilitated comparison of biomarker expression levels between DN and five other kidney diseases, highlighting their specificity for DN. These biomarkers also enabled the identification and validation of two molecular subtypes characterized by distinct immune profiles. The Nephroseq v5 database corroborated the correlation between biomarkers and clinical data. Furthermore, the GSigDB database was employed to predict protein-drug interactions, with molecular docking confirming the therapeutic potential of these drug targets. Finally, a diabetic mouse model (BKS-db) was constructed, and RT-qPCR experiments validated the reliability of the identified biomarkers. The study identified five biomarkers with robust diagnostic predictive power for DN. Subtype classification based on these biomarkers revealed distinct enrichment pathways and immune cell infiltration profiles, underscoring the close relationship between these genes and immune functions in DN. Drug prediction and molecular docking analyses demonstrated excellent binding affinities of candidate drugs to target proteins. Differential expression analysis between DN and five other kidney diseases indicated that all biomarkers, except C1orf21, were highly expressed in DN. Notably, as the mouse model lacks the C1orf21 gene, RT-qPCR confirmed the upregulated expression of FN1, CD36, CD48, and SRPX2. This study successfully identified five biomarkers with potential diagnostic and therapeutic value for DN. These biomarkers not only offer insights into the regulatory mechanisms underlying glomerular injury but also provide a theoretical foundation for the development of diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets related to DN-associated glomerular injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.