ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Deep learning-based prediction of individualized Real-time FSH doses in GnRH agonist long protocols.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning model predicts the early gastrointestinal dysfunction risk in severely burned patients: a multicenter-based study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- From static snapshots to longitudinal trajectories: artificial intelligence in women's reproductive and ovarian health.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Repair of female reproductive function by GDF-9-overexpressing extracellular vesicles via ACVR1B/SMAD2 regulation in ovarian granulosa.Science advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividualizing follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dosing during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is critical for optimizing outcomes in assisted reproduction but remains difficult due to patient heterogeneity. Most existing models are limited to static predictions of initial doses and do not support real-time adjustments throughout stimulation.
methodsWe developed a deep learning model that integrates cross-temporal and cross-feature encoding (CTFE) to predict personalized daily FSH doses in patients undergoing COS using the GnRH agonist long protocol. A total of 13,788 IVF/ICSI cycles conducted between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Women with baseline antral follicle counts between 7 and 30 were included. Data were randomly divided into training (n = 6761), validation (n = 2898), and test (n = 4135) sets. The model encodes both static (e.g., age, BMI, basic hormone levels) and dynamic (e.g., follicle development, hormone trends during COS) variables across stimulation days. Final dose predictions were generated using a K-nearest neighbor algorithm applied to low-dimensional latent representations derived from the deep encoder layers.
resultsThe CTFE model achieved a dose classification accuracy of 0.737 (± 0.004) and a weighted F1-score of 0.732 (± 0.005) on the test set. On key stimulation days 1 and 5, the CTFE model significantly outperformed traditional LASSO regression models (F1-score: 0.832 vs 0.699 on day 1; 0.817 vs 0.523 on day 5; p < 0.001). Prediction performance was maintained beyond day 13 using a sliding window mechanism, despite reduced data availability in longer stimulation cycles.
conclusionsThis is the first study to apply a cross-temporal and cross-feature deep learning framework for daily, individualized FSH dose prediction across the full duration of COS. The model demonstrated superior performance over conventional approaches and offers a promising tool for standardizing COS management. Although currently limited by its retrospective, single-center design, the model may support future clinical decision-making and improve COS outcomes. Prospective, multicenter validation studies are warranted to confirm its utility and generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.