ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2025
Development and validation of an early prediction model for cardiac death risk in patients with light chain amyloidosis: a multicenter study.
Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiac involvement is the primary driver of death in systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis. However, the early prediction of cardiac death risk in AL amyloidosis remains insufficient.
objectivesWe aimed to develop a novel prediction model and prognostic scoring system that enables early identification of these high-risk individuals.
methodsThis study enrolled 235 patients with confirmed AL cardiac amyloidosis from three hospitals. Patients from the first hospital were randomly assigned to the training and internal validation sets in an 8:2 ratio, while the external validation set comprised patients from the other two hospitals. Participants were categorized into a cardiac death group and a non-cardiac death group (including survivors and those who died from other causes). Five different machine learning models were used to train model, and model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.
resultsAll five models showed excellent performance on the training and internal validation sets. In external validation, both the Logistic Regression (LR) and Random Forest models achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.873 and 0.877, respectively, and exhibited superior calibration and decision curve analysis. Considering the comprehensive performance and clinical applicability, the LR model was selected as the final prediction model. The visualization results are ultimately presented in a nomogram. Further analyses were performed on the newly identified predictors.
conclusionsThis prediction model enables early identification and risk assessment of cardiac death in patients with AL amyloidosis, exhibiting considerable predictive ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.